This product has already been purchased.
- First Nations directors bring strong capability and diverse perspectives to governance across community, government, not-for-profit and commercial organisations.
- Capability is not the key barrier. First Nations representation remains very limited on major commercial boards, despite strong interest in commercial governance opportunities.
- Boards can help close the opportunity gap by broadening recruitment networks, recognising diverse governance experience and creating pathways through sponsorship.
For too long, a lack of national data has limited our understanding of First Nations representation in Australian boardrooms. That is now beginning to change, write Dr Gaala Watson and Justin Agale.
Until now, limited national data has made it difficult to build a clear picture of First Nations directorship in Australia. The First Nations Sector Snapshot 2026 report begins to address that gap. Drawing together data from the Australian Institute of Company Directors membership, several governance datasets, a member survey and interviews with First Nations directors, the research establishes an important baseline for understanding where First Nations directors serve, what they bring to boards and what continues to shape their pathways into governance.
The findings tell a clear story: capability is not the primary barrier.
Bringing broader perspectives to boards
First Nations directors are contributing across community-controlled organisations, not-for-profits, government and statutory bodies, and commercial enterprises. Among surveyed First Nations directors, 88.5% agreed they had the skills, knowledge and experience to contribute effectively as a board member. Many hold multiple board roles, serve on board committees and bring experience from executive leadership and business ownership.
Their motivations also demonstrate the broader value they bring to governance. The most common motivations identified by surveyed directors were using their skills and experience to make an impact and supporting First Nations leadership and self-determination. Creating positive outcomes for community and influencing strategic direction were also significant motivations.
This community orientation does not sit apart from effective governance. It can enhance it.
First Nations directors described considering not only an organisation’s immediate purpose, but also its wider effect on community, employment, suppliers and Country. These perspectives can help boards understand their operating environment, ask better questions and consider the longer-term consequences of their decisions.
Yet the Snapshot also identifies a significant gap between capability and opportunity.
First Nations directors: Strong capability, limited opportunity
Across the ASX100 sample examined in the research, four of 707 directorships were held by three identified First Nations directors. At the same time, 67.2% of surveyed First Nations directors said they were seeking commercial governance opportunities. This included directors with commercial board experience who wanted to progress, as well as people seeking their first commercial role.
The challenge is not simply creating interest in governance. That interest and experience already exist. The challenge is visibility, recognition and access.
Relationships remain a major pathway into board roles. Among the surveyed directors, 44.2% entered their first governance role through professional networks and 29.2% through a community invitation. Lack of visibility or opportunity was the most frequently identified barrier to governance roles. For commercial boards specifically, directors also identified tokenistic approaches, limited commercial exposure, recruitment practices and experience requirements as barriers.
Strengthening First Nations governance pathways
These findings should prompt boards to examine how they identify and appoint directors. Does the search extend beyond familiar professional networks? Does the skills matrix recognise experience gained across community-controlled organisations, government bodies and the not-for-profit sector? Are First Nations candidates being considered because of their full contribution and capability, rather than being approached to fill a designated seat?
Boards can also help create the experience they often require. Observer placements, associate director positions and committee appointments can provide practical exposure to commercial governance. Sponsorship from established chairs and directors can create introductions, visibility and opportunities that training alone cannot deliver.
The responsibility does not rest with First Nations directors to continually demonstrate that they are ready. Boards, search firms, directors and organisations must also consider whether existing appointment systems are capable of recognising the talent already available.
The Snapshot gives Australia a stronger evidence base from which to act. It also provides an opportunity to move the conversation from aspiration to practical change.
The capability is already here. The next step is ensuring that pathways, networks and appointment processes allow it to be seen, valued and included.
Dr Gaala Watson is a Gangalu and Birri-Gubba (Wiri) scholar, strategist and governance expert at the University of Queensland Business School, where she researches Aboriginal governance, Indigenous economics, management and leadership.
Justin Agale MAICD is the AICD’s Sector Lead for First Nations. A Kariyarra and Meriam (Torres Strait) man from Port Hedland in Western Australia’s Pilbara, he has driven the development of the AICD’s First Nations sector strategy, co-chairs its Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan working group and works with First Nations directors and the broader sector.
Dr Watson and Agale are co-authors of the First Nations Sector Snapshot 2026.
Latest news
Already a member?
Login to view this content