Boards are entering 2026 in a world looking markedly different from a year ago. For directors, the challenge is no longer just spotting risks, but rethinking governance to stay ahead.
Governance expert Steven Bowman FAICD, managing director of Conscious Governance, says future-focused boards will sharpen how they monitor strategy, nurture culture, develop workforce capability, manage risk and refresh themselves.
The pressures on governance are intensifying, says Graham Kittle, Managing Partner of Heidrick & Struggles Australia. Many boards still struggle with strategic questions that strike at the core of long-term value, he says, adding that directors must be asking: “Why does our board exist, and is our strategy aligned with long-term value creation?”
He explains that nearly “60 per cent of board agendas are still weighted toward traditional oversight areas such as financial performance, risk and shareholder concerns, leaving limited room for forward-looking planning.”
Together, Bowman and Kittle’s insights create a clear picture: boards must evolve across five critical fronts if they are to remain effective stewards in 2026.
1. Look for signals that show strategy is ageing
Too often, boards judge strategy by past results, rather than scanning for subtle signs the operating environment is shifting. Bowman urges directors to prioritise “forward-looking leading indicators” that reveal early shifts in performance, innovation, stakeholder engagement and organisational resilience.
Kittle agrees boards must step back from backward-looking reporting. He argues directors should question whether the strategy is truly future-focused, and whether conversations “are happening with the depth, rigour and frequency required to shape long-term value”.
Purpose, in particular, should become a tool for strategic clarity, says Bowman. “Great organisations use their vision or purpose statement to analyse future potential innovation and provide a filter for assessing whether existing programs or services should be reimagined for greater value creation or removed.”
Boards should also expect clearer, more focused reporting. Dashboards tied to risk appetite, strategy and long-term value far outweigh voluminous reports in signalling what deserves board attention, says Bowman.
2. Culture starts with the board
If strategy determines direction, culture determines whether the organisation can get there. But Bowman warns that culture oversight often focuses on the wrong signals.
“A healthy culture is not what is written in policy documents. It is what people believe and do when no-one is watching. Boards must move beyond glossy survey results to understand the deeper patterns of behaviour that shape organisational reality.”
Kittle’s research reinforces the centrality of culture, beginning with the board itself. He observes that “how directors interact — the balance of voices, the behaviours modelled by the chair, and the space created for constructive challenge — often reflects the culture experienced across the organisation”. When boardroom dynamics suppress dissent or rely on a few dominant voices, similar patterns tend to appear deeper in the business.
Bowman recommends a tool called Unwritten Ground Rules, the brainchild of Steve Simpson, which he describes as revealing “the true behavioural norms that govern day-to-day work”. Harder indicators — staff turnover in critical roles, internal mobility, whistleblower activity, absenteeism and customer experience — can complement these insights.
“When aligned with dedicated assurance processes led by internal audit, HR, risk and compliance, these insights create a complete picture,” he says. “Some organisations have embedded a director into exit interview panels for key staff who leave, to create an awareness at board level of any trends or cultural issues starting to emerge.”
Board visibility is also crucial, he stresses, adding directors should observe “frontline environments as part of their induction and re-induction processes, meet staff and be aware of concerns”.
“Culture comes alive through lived experience, not filtered reporting,” he says. “Where incentives and values do not align, culture will weaken. Where leadership behaviour matches stated values, culture thrives.”
.jpg)
3. Capability planning is core governance
As AI, digital transformation and sustainability obligations intensify, the capability challenge is becoming existential. Bowman argues skills planning must be elevated from a management exercise to a strategic responsibility of the board.
To remain relevant, he says, organisations must anticipate future skills needed for digital transformation, ethical use of AI, sustainability leadership and advanced stakeholder engagement.
Kittle’s findings show this extends beyond workforce capability and reaches the leadership pipeline itself.
“CEO and executive succession remain among the most critical priorities for boards today,” he says. “Boards should be examining whether they have clear, ongoing programs to identify and develop future leaders, robust insight into internal capabilities, and a strategic approach that ensures leadership continuity.”
Bowman reiterates the need for boards to insist on periodic capability reviews that map future needs to current strengths.
“These reviews should be informed by clear scenarios. For example, what will your operations look like when AI handles routine processing? What skills will sustainability regulation require in three years? What digital literacy will every employee need to function confidently in the next strategic cycle?”
Ultimately, says Bowman, “learning and development must be strategic”.
“Encourage multi-year learning roadmaps for staff with structured programs for data literacy, AI ethics, ESG frameworks and change leadership,” he advises. “Combine formal learning with experiential learning through on-the-job rotations, cross-functional projects and innovation pilots.”
4. Risk appetite must move the environment
Boards face a dense cluster of emerging risks heading into 2026, including rapid growth in AI adoption, escalating regulatory expectations, climate and sustainability obligations, cyber risk, and geopolitical and supply chain pressures.
“These risks require boards to reconsider their risk appetite,” argues Bowman. “A risk appetite statement only has value when it is used actively and provides clear guidance to staff about what the board’s focus is. It must be revisited whenever external conditions shift.”
Boards, he suggests, need to articulate “the thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable risk, align decision-making with those boundaries and ensure the organisation has the capacity to respond when risks crystallise”.
“Risk appetite should be integrated into the risk register,” he adds.
Similarly, Kittle suggests directors maintain clear visibility over risk frameworks, technology and AI strategies, and culture indicators. “They should engage regularly with the executive bench and external advisors to anticipate challenges and assess emerging risks,” he says.
Top risks to watch in 2026
- Ethical & regulatory risk of AI: With AI adoption accelerating, risks include algorithmic bias, data privacy, governance of decision-making, regulatory non-compliance and reputational harm.
- Climate/ESG risk: Not just physical risk (climate change), but transition risk (policy, regulatory, reputational), supply chain risk and social risk (inequity, stakeholder activism).
- Cyber & digital resilience: As organisations digitise more, cybersecurity risk, data governance and third-party dependencies become more acute.
- Talent risk: Rapid technology change combined with workforce capability gaps (skills, diversity) is a strategic risk and resource scarcity.
- Purpose & reputation risk: Internal and external stakeholders demand more — boards must guard against “purpose-washing” or purpose drift, which can damage trust.
5. The next frontier of governance maturity
The final shift Bowman highlights is internal — boards must hold themselves to the same standard of future-readiness they expect from management.
High-performing boards in 2026 will “integrate purpose into decision-making, review risk dynamically rather than as a compliance exercise” and embed continuous learning for directors and the organisation.
They will streamline reporting with “fewer but more meaningful metrics” and focus agendas on long-term value drivers.
Effective evaluation is essential, he adds, noting that meaningful reviews require “independent facilitation, honest conversations, structured interviews and feedback from senior executives and stakeholders”.
“The goal is not to critique for criticism’s sake, but to understand how the board can operate at a higher level.”
Bowman’s tips include:
Structured evaluation: Use independent facilitation with audits, interviews, and stakeholder surveys. Include key internal and external perspectives. Map findings to concrete improvements and review annually.
Skills & diversity: Refresh the skills matrix for digital, AI/ESG, geopolitical and risk capabilities. Factor in behavioural, generational and cognitive diversity. Plan succession to build a future-ready pipeline.
Onboarding & development: Deliver 12-month, mentor-linked inductions covering strategy, culture, stakeholders and risk. Allocate board time for ongoing learning on AI, ESG, digital and cyber.
A turning point for governance
Taken together, these shifts represent a pivot point for boards. The message from the experts is clear — in a more complex and contested environment, boards must be more intentional about how they steer, how they learn, how they challenge and how they renew themselves.
The boards that embrace this approach will set their organisations up to navigate the next strategic cycle with clarity and confidence.
Key takeaways for high-performing boards
- Purpose-driven, strategic stewardship: Boards will embed purpose into core governance, using it to guide strategy and drive innovation, not as a soft add-on.
- Dynamic risk governance: Risk will be treated strategically, with time each meeting to challenge assumptions, stress test scenarios and embed innovation oversight in governance.
- Continuous learning and board refresh: Directors will focus on capability development in digital, ESG and emerging risks, and build future-ready boards through forward-looking recruitment.
- Strategic and lean reporting: Boards will streamline agendas and reporting, focusing on fewer, meaningful metrics, leading indicators, risk trends and stakeholder insights, supported by fit-for-purpose tools.
- Evaluation with intent: Boards will conduct honest, structured self-assessments (ideally facilitated) to surface governance blind spots, capabilities gaps and areas for renewal.
Latest news
Already a member?
Login to view this content