ACSI releases updated Governance Guidelines

Thursday, 05 February 2026

    Current

    On 20 January 2026, the Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ACSI) released the two-yearly update of its Governance Guidelines, which outline ACSI’s expectations on governance and sustainability issues at listed companies.


    W

    hile ACSI takes a principles-based approach, and encourages companies to adopt fit for purpose governance arrangements (and explain them), its Guidelines outline clear expectations of listed entities and their boards across four key areas: board and director responsibilities; capital structure and shareholder rights; remuneration; andoversight of material sustainability risks and opportunities.

    Key shifts

    Informed by stakeholder engagement with market participants and contemporary market issues, the updated Guidelines address emerging governance issues relating to artificial intelligence, workforce, diversity and corporate culture.

    The Guidelines also incorporate structural updates to clarify expectations in relation to the role and responsibilities of boards – framed by ACSI’s emphasis that shareholders are best served by well-constructed boards driving better decision-making and long-term value creation.

    Further, each chapter of the Guidelines now includes a box on ACSI’s view on common better practice disclosures, drawing on the principles outlined in each chapter.

    Notable changes include:

    • Succession planning: An increased focus on the need for clearer linkages between board skills and experience, succession and director elections and re-elections.
    • Founding or controlling shareholders: Expanded commentary on ACSI’s expectations of boards to manage the governance risks associated with founding or controlling shareholders. For example, ACSI expects boards to manage competing interests, ensure adequate safeguards for minority and non-controlling shareholders, understand potential influence across the business and establish appropriate mitigations, and, where possible, appoint a chair without any connection to the controlling shareholder. ACSI’s examples of better practice disclosures in this context include the existence of a plan for founder succession.
    • Artificial intelligence: Inclusion of ACSI’s expectations of boards in relation to oversight of digitalisation including AI. For example, ACSI expects boards to have appropriate and proportionate governance structures, establish relevant policies and processes, consider instituting policies and principles to manage potential workforce disclosure driven by AI, and support a culture of responsible AI practices, data governance and cyber security. (For AICD’s suite of resources on AI governance, see here.)
    • Organisational culture: Expanded commentary on ACSI’s expectations of boards with respect to corporate culture covering tone from the top, articulation of desired culture and understanding of existing culture, ‘speak-up’ culture, and oversight of sexual harassment risk and non-disclosure agreements.
    • Diversity: Additional commentary on inclusive and diverse workplace cultures.  For example, ACSI expects boards to carefully consider how a diverse workforce may support the company’s strategy, and how to support an inclusive culture (including proactively identifying and mitigating any form of discrimination, such as racism, and harassment in the workplace).
    • Workforce: An expanded focus on expectations regarding active oversight of workforce strategy and risk, including where workforce structures may rely on precarious or casual labour and result in high turnover. ACSI expects boards to oversee processes and systems to manage labour-rights and job-security risks, engage meaningfully with the workforce (including unions), and oversee a strategy to manage turnover and achieve desired workforce composition, supported by appropriate investment in training.

    Key takeaways for directors of listed entities

    The updated Guidelines will form the basis for ACSI’s engagement with companies and underpin its voting recommendations over the next two years.

    The updates clearly signal areas of focus for long term institutional investors during a period of rapid change, driven by workplace shifts, digital transformation and an evolving geopolitical landscape. Boards – especially chairs and relevant committee chairs – will work with management to understand implications for their organisations, governance arrangements and investor engagement.


    Latest news

    This is of of your complimentary pieces of content

    This is exclusive content.

    You have reached your limit for guest contents. The content you are trying to access is exclusive for AICD members. Please become a member for unlimited access.